TEORI KE 5 - MENJADIKAN IA LEBIH KOMPLEX
Rajin kita membaca dan menelaah berita-berita dari dalam dan luar negara akan membawa kita kepada agenda "Hidden Hand" terhadap beberapa perlakuan misteri termasuklah Pesawat Mas MH370. Kalau dulu dari awal2 berita kehilangan ini saya telah menyatakan bahawa MH370 telah singgah mengisi minyak disitu dan terus menyambung perjalanannya dengan kepakaran penerbangan yang dilakukan oleh Juruterbang terhebat yang membawa pesawat di udara dgn ketinggian yang "sukar" di kesan oleh radar... ataupun memang ia diterbangkan dgn "Auto Pilot".
Apa pun saya masih menegaskan bhw MH370 semuanya selamat dan berada didalam "bunker" sehingga percaturan "Kuasa Besar" menemui Jalan Muktamat/checkmate. Dimana MH370 menjadi tandatanya dan mengapa anak kapal & penumpangnya terus membisa, walaupun terdapat kesan2 isyarat yg mrk mungkin cuba membuat hubungan telefon or internet... Dimana mereka mungkin.. di Diego Garcia.., di Ukraine... Negara bergolak... mungkin MH370 menjadi "Perisai Percaturan Dunia"......... adakah ada kaitan dgn Semiconductor Group... Perisian dan Pakar Satelite Era kini..... atau apa dan apa?...
Kenapa di kaitkan dgn Malaysia... Siapa rakyat Malaysia yg terkenal baik dgn Yahudi?.. Soros.. Presiden Bank Dunia satu ketika dulu...., mungkin juga satu tekanan kepada Najib Perdana Menteri.. agar letak jawatan nak masukkan orang yang "Rapat dgn Yahudi".. senang utk Amerika bertenggek di belakang bagi menguasai Asia Tenggara.... Namun, sepandai manusia membuat berbagai perancangan onar.. namun Perancangan ALLAH lebih Maha Bijaksana.. dan Alhamdulillah.. Negara Tanah Melayu adalah Negara berdaulat yg masih ramai para2 alim bertasbih dan berzikir memohon agar dunia Tanah Melayu kekal bermertabat. Tanah Melayu mempunyai banjaran gunung sebagai pahat dari selatan ke utara... maka ramai juga para ahli2 sufi yang.................... Hanya kekuatan Allah yang kekal...
Adakah isu Ukraine, Crimea, Syria dan Afghanistan ada bersangkut paut dgn "Hidden hand" ini... Kenapa ada ayat ini " Will Israel kill US empire this week?"
Mari kita selidiki............
China has maintained a very careful and
consistent foreign policy of non-interference. It has steadfastly condemned
foreign incursions into other nations under any pretext.
In recent years, this has been extended
to NATO’s adventures in Libya and Syria, where China has been vocal in its
condemnation of foreign meddling.
This is not only because China believes
in national sovereignty in general as the foundation upon which it is building
its global influence, but also and perhaps primarily because it fears for its
own territorial integrity at home.
When Crimea voted to join the Russian Federation, the
Chinese were particularly cautious in how they responded diplomatically. China
even abstained from voting on a resolution submitted
to the UN General Assembly backing Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
Their somewhat ambiguous statements and
moves have given license to international press houses to portray China as
opposing Russia. Headlines such as the Business Insider’s “China Doesn’t Back Russia’s Invasion
Of Crimea — And That’s A Big Problem For Putin,” seem to describe
Beijing as wholly abandoning Moscow over the ongoing Ukraine crisis.
The Business Insider
even goes as far as saying, ”Russia’s Vladimir Putin has committed a grave
strategic blunder by tearing up the international rule book without a green
light from China. Any hope of recruiting Beijing as an ally to blunt Western
sanctions looks doomed, and with it the Kremlin’s chances of a painless
victory, or any worthwhile victory at all.”
Mass media trying to frame Putin as a threat
Another assessment, this time from Bloomberg’s
Businessweek, strikes a little closer to reality. In an article titled, “Is China Siding With Putin in the
Ukraine Crisis?,” Businessweek states, “The Chinese might
naturally sympathize with Vladimir Putin, someone willing to stick it to
Western leaders such as President Obama.
However, China has long opposed actions
that smack of interference in other countries’ internal affairs, in part to
keep outsiders away from such sensitive issues as Tibet and Chinese
dissidents.”
In reality, Beijing has departed with
Moscow in rhetorical terms only, and even still, only tentatively so. In
reality, Beijing and Moscow are still working closely together with common
strategic interests in mind, and China most certainly is backing Russia in
regards to Ukraine, however subtly.
Editorial angles like those at the
Business Insider, as well as Foreign Policy Magazine, and TIME, are attempts to
stir up division if possible among the ranks of analysts and editorial boards
prone to taking up sensational narratives.
This then helps build public consensus, however has little to no effect
on the diplomatic ties between Russia and China, or each nation’s respective
foreign policies.
While China
persistently maintains its non-interference stance in all matters foreign
policy, and many have tried to compare Russia’s involvement in Crimea as
comparable to Tibet being peeled away from China, in reality what Russia has
done is more closely an analogue of what China would like to see become of
Taiwan and other disputed regions it has historical, cultural, linguistic,
financial, and geopolitical strategic ties to.
In fact, what has created the Ukrainian
crisis in the first place, namely US and European Union backing of opposition
groups to overturn not only Ukraine’s political order, but Ukraine’s long
standing relationship with Moscow, resembles precisely what the United
States has been and continues to try to do in
Chinese territory, particularly in Tibet and the western province of
Xinjiang.
By supporting Russia on Ukraine, China
will be able to ensure it too can reserve the right to protect itself along its
own borders from foreign-backed upheaval.
The prospect of large scale unrest in China’s border provinces and
the installation of a foreign backed government attempting to breakaway from
Beijing would necessitate China to make moves very similar to what Russia has
done in Crimea.
In many ways, China is
already struggling along this path to maintain its territorial integrity,
albeit on a smaller scale, attempting to check foreign funded independence
movements by reasserting Beijing’s authority through a combination of soft
power backed by security operations when necessary.
A propaganda hyped NeoCon map which doubled the Russian numbers
and used the term border when really in the ‘region’.
Despite the sensational headlines, the thinking in Beijing most
certainly gravitates toward backing Russia on the Ukraine issue. Its perceived ambiguous diplomatic
stance on the matter affords it more room to maneuver, not just in regards to
its subtle support for Russia, but in all matters regarding both foreign and
domestic policy.
By taking too strong a stance now,
Beijing might tie its hands in the future when it is their turn to guard their
territory and their various spheres of influence.
This too might be what was intended by
the West’s intentional twisting of Beijing’s statements, to garner from China’s
leadership a more committal statement that can be used against it in the near
future.
As one of China’s greatest strengths,
opacity in all it does has left its competitors in the West confounded, and
wisely, Beijing has denied the West this latest potential leverage by not
taking a firmer stance on Crimea.
Determining what China’s leadership is thinking when they look at
Crimea, either “Taiwan” or “Tibet,” is difficult at best and leaves China with
the ability to pursue its agenda regarding both without any rhetorical
commitments to tie it down regarding the Ukraine crisis or its support for Russia.
Mungkinkah ..... MH370 ada tersimpan di Negara yang sedang bergolak ini dan menjadi Perisai di dalam NWO - New World Order... dan laluan "Hujung Dunia" itu hanya helah untuk membuat dunia berprasangka berbagai-bagai hipotesis yang akhirnya menjurus kepada " A Game Maker "
Is
China Siding With Putin in the Ukraine Crisis?
Photograph by Giorgio Cosulich/Getty Images
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
China’s leaders are
struggling to come up with a comprehensible position on thecrisis in Ukraine. The
Chinese might naturally sympathize with Vladimir Putin, someone willing to
stick it to Western leaders such as President Obama. However, China has long
opposed actions that smack of interference in other countries’ internal
affairs, in part to keep outsiders away from such sensitive issues as Tibet and
Chinese dissidents.
So for now, the
government’s solution seems to be simple: obfuscate. The Chinese and Russian
foreign ministers spoke by telephone today, and while Russia’s Sergei Lavrov
said afterwards that the two countries are in agreement about the crisis,
China’s official spokesman shied away from taking a stand.
First, the Russian
take: According to the Voice of America, Putin’s foreign ministry said today,
“Russia and China havecoinciding views on the situation in Ukraine.”
But do they? China’s
official Xinhua news agency yesterday reported China’s position, as articulated
by a Foreign Ministry spokesman: “China always sticks to the principle of non-interference in any
country’s internal affairs and respects the independence, sovereignty, and territorial
integrity of Ukraine.”
Then, late today
(China time), came what might seem like a word-salad of a statement from
official spokesman Qin Gang elaborating on the one from Sunday. “China upholds
its own diplomatic principles and the basic codes for international relations, which have also been implied on
the Ukraine issue,” Qin said when asked for comments on Russia’s
actions. “Meanwhile, we have also taken the historical and contemporary factors
of the Ukraine issue into consideration.”
Xinhua helpfully
explained that this comment “clarifies” China’s position on Russia’s actions in
Crimea.
And strangely enough,
it might. Without stating publicly that they’re giving Putin a pass for
interfering in Ukraine, the Chinese seem to be leaning more toward the Russians
and against the West. Or, as Qin cryptically put it, “there have been reasons
for today’s situation in Ukraine.” Hard to argue with that. There have
indeed been reasons for what’s going on in Ukraine, just as there have been
reasons for what’s going on in lots of places. Do the Ukrainian reasons mean
China’s willing to look the other way when Russia interferes in a neighboring
country?
The Chinese aren’t
saying that just yet. But with China possessing veto power on the United
Nations Security Council, the government probably won’t be able to keep quiet
much longer.
[ Mungkin maklumat di atas ini juga menjurus kepada apa yg telah saya perkatakan dan diskusikan. ]
1 comment:
ASSUMING WITHOUT ASSURANCE
Post a Comment